Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center Publishes Guidelines on Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration
|
Listen to Audio Version of Text
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center has published for public comment a first draft of “Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration.” The proposed guidelines were drafted by the Center’s AI Task Force Guidelines Drafting Subcommittee and are intended to provide a framework for how to use artificial intelligence in domestic and international arbitrations.
The guidelines contain three key chapters: a chapter that applies to all participants in international arbitrations, a chapter that applies to parties and party representatives, and a chapter that applies to arbitrators. The topics addressed by the guidelines include safeguarding confidentiality, duty of competence or diligence in the use of AI, and non-delegation of decision-making responsibilities.
To view and comment on the guidelines, check out the following link: SVAMC AI GUIDELINES PORTAL (typeform.com) The deadline for submitting comments is September 30, 2023.
DIGITAL HEALTH LAW BLOG
- What are the Lessons to Be Learned from Today’s Worldwide Technology Disruption Over Software Update?
- Does Your Digital Health Company Rely on an Annual Paid Monthly Subscription Model?
- FTC Seeks to Expand Scope of “Negative Option Rule” to Apply to Subscriptions
- FTC Sues Software Company over Annual Paid Monthly Subscription Contract
- Digital Health AI Start-Ups Concerned as California’s AI Legislation Moves Closer to Adoption
- The Prinz Law Office Announces Launch of New Subscription Plans
- HHS Publishes Proposed Rule Defining Information Blocking Penalties for Medical Providers
- DEA Extends COVID-19 Telemedicine Rules
- New California Law to Mandate Release of VC Investment Diversity Information
SAAS CONTRACTS LAW BLOG
- What are the Lessons to be Learned from Today’s Worldwide Tech Failure Over a Software Update?
- New FTC “Click to Cancel” Rule Would Apply to SaaS Subscriptions
- FTC Complaint Alleges Annual Paid Subscription Contract Violates Federal Law
- The Prinz Law Office Launches New Subscription Plan
- Software Licensing vs. Software-as-a-Service (“Saas”) : The Importance of the Technology Model to Contract Drafting
- Insurance Industry Guidance to Consider When Negotiating a SaaS Indemnification Clause
- Capitalizing on SaaS Sales Opportunities During the Coronavirus Crisis Without Creating New Legal Risks
- Practice Tips for Renegotiating Contracts due to Coronavirus Uncertainty and Changed Business Conditions
- Force Majeure and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Does Your Software Company Need to Know?
- Why “SaaS Agreements” are not “SaaS Licenses”
